Skip to main content
CoReLift
Menu

CoReLift · Execution self-check

Is the right work moving fast enough?

20 statements across five dimensions help you identify friction in priorities, accountability, decisions and execution.

Start the self-check Download the worksheet

Assess today's practice using examples from the last four weeks. 0 = no agreed practice; 1 = partly defined or dependent on individuals; 2 = clear and consistently followed. Your answers stay in this browser window and are not submitted.

Statements answered: 0 / 20

01 · Priorities and focus

01 · The three most important outcomes for the current review period are clearly named.
02 · The leadership team aligns decisions and resources with the same priorities.
03 · A new priority triggers an explicit decision to stop, pause or continue existing work.
04 · The three to five initiatives critical to these outcomes can be named immediately.

02 · Accountability and handovers

05 · Each critical initiative has exactly one named person accountable for its outcome.
06 · That person's mandate, necessary participants and escalation path are clear.
07 · Cross-functional handovers have a clear sender, recipient and deadline.
08 · Missed commitments are actively addressed in the agreed review rhythm.

03 · Decisions and escalation

09 · Teams know their decision limits and when approval is required.
10 · Open decisions have a clear accountable person, required input and decision date.
11 · Decisions are briefly documented and their implementation is followed up.
12 · Escalations have clear triggers and include consequences and options.

04 · Review rhythm and visibility

13 · A regular leadership review covers priorities, signals, blockers, decisions and actions.
14 · Critical blockers become visible early, before a milestone is missed.
15 · Decision-relevant signals for key initiatives are reviewed at least weekly.
16 · Every leadership review ends with an action, accountable person and deadline.

05 · Capacity and follow-through

17 · The active portfolio is explicitly divided into work to continue, pause or stop.
18 · New work starts only after checking capacity, dependencies and open decisions.
19 · After important decisions, someone checks that the agreed implementation has begun.
20 · Changes to priorities or deadlines are deliberate and visible to those affected.

Interpretation

This is a practical self-assessment using an internal scoring heuristic. It is not a diagnosis, a market benchmark or proof of performance. Concrete examples and differences between participants matter more than the total.